【 – 写作指导】
篇一:《GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析》
GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析
GMAT写作七宗罪在GMAT写作中的地位不容小觑，考生想要获得GMAT写作高分就必须对GMAT写作七宗罪有全面准确的理解，这样才能保证GMAT作文的质量。接下来小编就GMAT写作七宗罪为大家做详细介绍，希望对大家的GMAT写作备考有帮助。
一、什么是“七宗罪”
GMAT作文七宗罪是指GMAT驳论文Argument题目中存在的逻辑漏洞或错误，考生根据考试中常见的逻辑漏洞和考察方向把其总结为“七宗罪”，既形象又方便参加GMAT考试备考的考生进行背诵。考生在备考时可以按照七宗罪中的逻辑错误类型进行有目的的查找，一方面节省了考试时间，另一方面确保找到的逻辑错误的准确，对于提升GMAT写作效率也非常有帮助。
通常考生所说的七宗罪指的就是：第一宗罪：无因果联系，第二宗罪：样本不足，第三宗罪：错误类比(横向)第四宗罪：时地全等(没有用发展的观点看待问题)，第五宗罪：二者择一(非此即彼)，第六宗罪：可疑调查，第七宗罪：结论无据(无根据假设)。可能个别地方的叫法不完全一样，考生只要知道其表达的真正意义即可。更多相关内容请点击GMAT写作考试七宗罪分析。
二、七宗罪包含哪些内容
第一宗罪：无因果联系，是指作者给出的解释和得出的结论没有因果上的联系，或者是二者毫不相关。
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 样本不足，是指给出的论据或例子不充分，不足以说明某个问题，不能支撑作者得出这样的结论。
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion, unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that…. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比，即把毫不相关的两个事物拿来作比较，并由此得出一些结论。
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A…, however, B…. Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do….
第四宗罪 时地全等，主要是指没有用发展的观点看待问题，拿过去的事例和现在的作对比，并由此得出结论。
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that…. The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current
conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that….更多相关内容请点击GMAT写作找准逻辑错误是关键。
第五宗罪 二者择一，即限制了结论的范围，按照非此即彼的观点得出结论。{七宗罪的作文}.
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪 可疑调查，指作者提供的证据是片面的或者是有限的，不能保证结论的顺利推出。 The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 结论无据，指得出的结论是毫无根据的，或者是前面的假设是不能成立的。
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that…. However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that…. Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility。更多相关内容请点击GMAT写作常见错误之七宗罪。
考生在利用七宗罪进行文章论证的时候一定要注意这些逻辑错误的攻击点在哪里，掌握GMAT写作的主要反驳方法。这样能够使大家的论证更加充分，更加有理有据。总之，大家要切记，GMAT写作离不开七宗罪，七宗罪更有可能让你的文章脱颖而出。
以上就是前程百利小编为大家带来的GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析的详细内容，考生可针对文中介绍的方法进行有针对性的备考。更多关于GMAT考试备考的文章小编会陆续为大家呈现，祝大家备考顺利，都能取得好成绩。
篇二:《GMAT argument写作七宗罪的记忆方法》
AA七宗罪的记忆方法：因、果、证
分析了两个晚上的AA，发现"七宗罪"确实是好东西，就是那些"罪"太多、而且过于零散，很难记忆。因此将七宗罪分类整理了一下，按照论证的原因、结果、论证过程三部分，归为三个类别：
因、果、证
1、因
就是原因上的问题，有以下三个：
可疑调查
样本不足
结论无据
2、果
就是结论上的问题，有以下两个：
无因果联系
二者择一
3、证
就是论证过程上的问题，有以下两个，纵向横向各一个：
错误类比（横向）
时地全等（纵向）
这样，只要记住了三字诀：因、果、证，就很容易记牢全部七宗罪了。
顺便分析一下本月JJ的一篇AA：
"Our total sales have increased this year by 20 percent since we added a pharmacy section to our
grocery store. Clearly, the customer's main concern is the convenience afforded by one-stop
shopping. // 无因果联系，可能另有他因。 The surest way to increase our profits over the next couple
of years, therefore, is to add a clothing department along with an automotive supplies and repair
shop. We should also plan to continue adding new departments and services, such as a restaurant
and a garden shop, in subsequent years. // 时地全等 Being the only store in the area that offers such a range of services will give us a competitive advantage over other local stores." // 结论无据
附：七宗罪
第一宗罪：无因果联系{七宗罪的作文}.
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused
B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 样本不足 Insufficient-sample
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that…. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比 (based on a false analogy )<横向>
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A…, however, B…. Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do….
第四宗罪 时地全等 all things are equal<纵向>
The author commits the fallacy of "all things are equal". The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that…. The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that….
第五宗罪 二者择一 Either-Or choice
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.{七宗罪的作文}.
第六宗罪 可疑调查 survey is doubtful
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that…would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 结论无据 gratuitous assumption
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that…. However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that…. Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
篇三:《GMAT 作文七宗罪》
About AA
开头
1. using your own word to express the meaning of the item.
2. 转述题目中对该结论的support的理由
3. 指出改IDEA不有说服力。
1. The author concludes that…….
This speaker claims that……
In this argument the author reaches the conclusion that.{七宗罪的作文}.
2. The reasons offered to support this conclusion are that …..The ground for his evidence is that…….
3. This argument suffers from several critical problems .This line of reasoning is unconvincing for a couple of reasons. The reasoning of the argument is biased due to the inadequate and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion .
肚子 ： 分论点的写法， 我觉得就是使劲不相信AUTHOR 我就是不和你一个调调
第一罪{七宗罪的作文}.
无因果联系： 前后发生 ， 不一定有因果联系 ， AS WELL AS 同时发生的东东
Causal relationship ,causal connection , causal claim , causal explanation. The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification…
The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B , the former event is responsibility for the latter .
The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality .However , the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.
二罪 样本不足
a short time 所得出的不能代表长期情况 &一个例子不能得出普遍结论
representative, typical ———–exceptional atypical
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it .
The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends.
One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion.
Unless it can be show that a is representative of all A . it is possible that…
In fact , in face of such limited evidence , the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
The argument contributes a characteristic of an individual member of a group to the group as a whole.
The author attempt to extract a general principle from a specific case,
三罪 错误类比 based on a false analogy
A B 有相似的但是可能不同的更多 SO A 适用的B 不一定哦
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects .
This assumption is weak , since although there are points of comparison between A and
B , there is much dissimilarities as well . For example , A…….., however B…..thus ,it is likely more difficult for B to do.
The argument is unconvincing also because it is based on a false analogy .Failing to take into account the possible difference between A and B , the arguer makes a hasty conclusion . It is entirely possible that A and B are not similar enough to justify this analogical deduction 类比推理,
Perhaps …….. Or perhaps{七宗罪的作文}.
Therefore , without providing sufficient information showing that most or even all of the conditions in A and B is similar or the same , the author cannot convince me that the method which is efficient in A can also be efficient in B .
四罪 不以发展的眼观看 thinks all things are equal
The author commits the fallacy of all things are equal.
The fact that happened two yers ago is not sound evidence to draw a conclusion that …….the author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or locations.
⑤罪 非此即彼 either – or choice
The author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusively alternatives and there is no room for the middle ground. However , the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both A and B might produce better results.
六罪 调差值得怀疑 数目有问题不有代表性
Whether the sample is large enough to be representative?
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative.
The cliam does not indicate who conducted the poll , who responded ,or when where and how the poll was conducted .
Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents , it is impossible to access the validity of the result. For example….
Until these question are answered ,the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
最后一死 无根据的假设
Gratuitous assumption.
题目的结论BASED ON 一个没有根据的假设上 这个假设always不成立因为他有其可能性 The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that….
However , no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption .
In fact , this is more likely that ….. therefore ,this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.
END To conclude , the argument is not very convincing
To sum up , the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to the arguer’s claim.
To strength the argument To solidity the argument To make it logically acceptable , Additionally , the author must provide sufficient evidence of…
Furthermore , the arguer would have to find out the real reasons that cause.
差不多就这些 大家加油啊
篇四:《gmat作文七宗罪》
严重推荐：Argument之七宗罪
第一宗罪：无因果联系
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 Insufficient-sample
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all
A. It is possible that…. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比 (based on a false analogy )<横向>
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A…, however, B…. Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do….
第四宗罪 all things are equal<纵向>
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that…. The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that….
第五宗罪 Either-Or choice
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪 survey is doubtful
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that…would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 gratuitous assumption
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that…. However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that…. Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.