【 – 字数作文】
篇一:《竞选州长(详案)》
竞选州长
板书：
竞选州长 不公平的竞选
马克·吐温
参加竞选 “我”
引文（罪行） 独白（心理）
遭受污蔑 毁我名声，
落入圈套 “无耻迫害” 放弃竞选
资本主义民主的虚伪和自由竞选的欺骗
篇二:《《竞选州长》教例评析》{关于竞选州长作文600字}.
先蓄势，再纵向深入
——《竞选州长》教例评析{关于竞选州长作文600字}.
[教例简述]
一、需要解决的问题是学习重点之一：运用大量引文推动情节发展的写法。{关于竞选州长作文600字}.
二、为顺利透彻地解决主问题，需进行有力的铺垫，蓄足了势之后再让学生自求其解。
以上是备课的总体思路。
下面是两节课中的四大板块。
第一板块：根据学习重点和课后思考题各自认真阅读课文。（15分钟） 第二板块：讨论三个问题（20分钟）
1、拟出全文的情节线萦。
（受到提名—参加竞选——祖母忠告——遭到诬陷的攻击——放弃竞选）
2、罗织在“我”身上的，有几条“罪状”？
（十大罪状：伪证、小偷、盗尸、酗酒、舞弊、讹诈、纵火、杀人、搜刮弃婴、流氓。）
3、课文中有哪些词语能表示出“我”的心理活动发展的线索？
（暗自得意、心理烦乱、无法撒手、诧异、不知所措、有了戒心、担心吊胆、深感羞辱、恐慌、吓得要发疯、甘拜下风、满怀懊恼）
第三板块：再讨论三个问题。（10分钟）
1、小说摘引材料的方法。
（直接引用与转述相结合。）
2、小说摘引材料的形式。
（详引和略摘相结合）
3、小说引文的内部联系。
（按时间发展的顺序，顺承式发展，逐步升级）{关于竞选州长作文600字}.
第四板块：探讨“运用大量引文”在小说中的作用，完成如下内容：
1、写发言稿，讨论上述主问题。（25分钟）
（“运用大量引文”在小说中的作用是：①表现了明暗两条线索的交织；②构成小说的基本情节；③推动情节的发展；④为人物心理活动的发展设置了恰切的情景；⑤逐步显露资产阶级政客的无耻与狠毒；⑥在矛盾双方胜败强烈的反差中揭示资产阶级“竞选民主”、“言论自由”的虚伪）
2、以《哈哈镜中的变形世界》为题写小作文，字数300字左右，要求结合课文的“运用大量引文”的写作特点，结合人物和主题谈自己的一点见解。时间15分钟。然后交流、评议15分钟。
[评析]
如果从“听课”的角度看，这两节课恐怕会使听课者坐冷板凳。瞧，一上课，学生要自读课文15分钟，再瞧，学生要写讨论稿，还要写15分钟的小作文。除了讨论的几个环节之外，一点儿也不热闹。
然而从“看课”的角度来品评，就会觉得这个教例的设计是很讲究科学性的。 第一，课堂教学的大量时间留给了学生。教师的作用就是牵、引、导、点拨，想出各种方法把学生思维的触角引入课文的深处。
第二，为了让学生对教学主问题有透彻的理解，教师先用自读，拟出情节线索、概括“罪状”、“清理”“心理活动”发展的线索，讨论摘引材料的方法等各
种手段让反复研读课文并在理解课文内容上达到较高的认识层次，然后再集中力量讨论。这种先蓄势再向纵深挖掘的方法在教学上具有很大的爆发力和持续的后劲。
第三、教学的层次非常清楚，提问要言不烦且牵动的知识面很宽，各个教学的板块联系紧密。小作文题《哈哈镜中的变形世界》表述美妙，不仅激发着学生的写作冲动，而且渗透着思想教育的因素。
篇三:《《竞选州长》中英文读后感整理加自创》
RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR{关于竞选州长作文600字}.
By Mark Twain
A few months ago Mark Twain was nominated for Governor of the great State of New York, to run against Stewart L. Woodford and John T. Hoffman, on an independent ticket. He somehow felt that he had one prominent advantage over these gentlemen, and that was, good character. It was easy to see by the newspapers, that if ever they had known what it was to bear a good name, that time had gone by. It was plain that in these latter years they had become familiar with all manner of shameful crimes. But at the very moment that he was exalting his advantage and joying in it in secret, there was a muddy undercurrent of discomfort "riling" the deeps of my happiness — and that was, the having to hear my name bandied about in familiar connection with those of such people. He grew more and more disturbed. Finally he wrote my grandmother about it. Her answer came quick and sharp. She said:
You have never done one single thing in all your life to be ashamed of — not one. Look at the newspapers — look at them and
comprehend what sort of characters Woodford and Hoffman are,{关于竞选州长作文600字}.
and then see if you are willing to lower yourself to their level and enter a public canvass with them.
It was his very thought! He did not sleep a single moment that night. But after all, he could not recede. He was fully committed and must go on with the fight. As he was looking listlessly over the papers at breakfast, he came across this paragraph, and he may truly say he never was so confounded before:
PERJURY. — Perhaps, now that Mr. Mark Twain is before the people as a candidate for Governor, he will condescend to explain how he came to be convicted of perjury by thirty-four witnesses, in Wakawak, Cochin China, in 1863, the intent of which perjury was to rob a poor native widow and her helpless family of a meagre
plantain patch, their only stay and support in their bereavement and their desolation. Mr. Twain owes it to himself, as well as to the great people whose suffrages he asks, to clear this matter up. Will he do it?
I thought he should burst with amazement! Such a cruel, heartless charge — I never had seen Cochin China! I never had beard of Wakawak! I didn't know a plantain patch from a kangaroo! I did not
know what to do. I was crazed and helpless. I let the day slip away without doing anything at all. The next morning the same paper had this — nothing more:
SIGNIFICANT. — Mr. Twain, it will be observed, is suggestively silent about the Cochin China perjury.
[Mem. — During the rest of the campaign this paper never referred to me in any other way than as "the infamous perjurer Twain."
Next came the "Gazette," with this:
WANTED TO KNOW. — Will the new candidate for Governor deign to explain to certain of his fellow-citizens (who are suffering to vote for him!) the little circumstance of his cabin-mates in Montana losing small valuables from time to time, until at last, these things having been invariably found on Mr. Twain's person or in his "trunk" (newspaper he rolled his traps in), they felt compelled to give him a friendly admonition for his own good, and so tarred and feathered him and rode him on a rail, and then advised him to leave a
permanent vacuum in the place he usually occupied in the camp. Will he do this?
Could anything be more deliberately malicious than that? For I never was in Montana in my life.
我们应当懂得：做任何事情，应当以正确的态度去对待，要脚踏实地的去做好每一件事情。只有用自己的实力去完成的事情，自己才会感到真正的快乐。正如在学习上，我们必须脚踏实地地去学，而不应投机取巧；反之，即使你获得了优良的学习成绩，也不能持久。
We should understand this: We should deal with everything hard,in correct ways. We should handle everything step by step. We should finish everything with our own great effort. Only in this way will we feel the happiness along the journey. As we are learning, we must learn it by heart,,and we should not try hard to speculate. Maybye we may get high marks in the exams by
speculating,but we cannot really learn the knowledge we should to know.
在漫长的人生路上，我们时时都会遇到对手。当我们与对手竞争时，请不要用诽谤这些手段来赢得暂时性的胜利。我们应当脚踏实
地，向对手展示出我们真正的实力。这样，快乐才会降临，人生才会更有价值。
Along our long travelling of life, we may come across our
opponents now and then. When we compite with them, please do not use dishonorable means to win them. Instead, we should be earnest and down-to-earth. We can show our real skill to our opponents. Thus we can catch the happiness of the match. Thus our life can be more valueable.
这篇小说揭露了美国“民主政治”的虚伪。一个正派、清白的老实人在竞选中成了最不正派、最不清白的“罪人”，这就告诉人们资本主义的所谓“自由竞选”、“民主政治”不过是资产阶级政客、残酷倾轧的遮羞布。小说也暴露了资本主义“言论自由”的虚伪。资产阶级的所谓“言论自由”实质就是用谎言来诬蔑、攻击、陷害对方，来蒙蔽欺骗人民群众。小说还撕开了资本主义国家“两党制”的画皮。资产阶级政党在本质上都是一样的，都不能反映广大人民的意志。
The book critical the hypocrisy of American’s “democratic political”. An honest man take part in the free election,then he becomes the worest person in the world. This tells us that some so-called “democratic political” are just the excuses of some politicians. The politicians use it to get their power. The book also