【 – 小学作文】
篇一:《德阳市旌阳区学生作文《美丽的东湖山》》
美丽的东湖山
德阳市一小 年级 班 黄柯源
指导教师：
我的家乡有一座美丽的山，叫东湖山，那里好山、好水、
好风景。
一进东湖山大门，一股清新的空气迎面扑来，夹杂着花香、草香，令人神清气爽。沿着石阶往上走，两旁开着红艳艳的桃花，就像小朋友的脸，在向我们微笑着打招呼，像是在说：“欢迎来到春天的乐园。”这些桃花一朵有一朵的姿势，看看这一朵很美，看看那一朵，也很美。花儿们有的才展开两三片花瓣。有的花瓣全展开了，露出嫩粉色的小花蕊。有的还是花骨朵儿，羞答答地藏在枝头，分外迷人。
一阵微风吹来，柳条在风中翩翩起舞，像姑娘的长辫子似的，那一抹儿新绿，让人呼吸到了春的气息。
山中的湖就更美了，远远望去，就像一面碧绿色的镜子。湖面上飘荡着一艘艘各色的游船，远远望去仿佛是湖上飘着的花瓣。游客们在船上谈笑风声，个个脸上洋溢着灿烂的笑容。湖里有许多小鱼在自由地玩耍。它们一会儿在水面上吐几个泡泡，一会儿沉到水底，像是在和我们捉迷藏。
我们小朋友最喜欢的地方就是沙滩了，那里阳光下金黄黄的一片，老远就传来一片欢笑声。小伙伴们迫不及待地跑过去，几下就堆出了一个漂亮的城堡。还在前面挖出一个护城河。大家争先恐后地去运水，衣服打湿了也不在乎。
东湖山，你真是我们大家的天然游乐园，我爱你，家乡的东湖山！
文庙广场的变化
德阳市一小 年级 班 黄柯源
指导教师：
我的家就住在文庙广场的旁边，妈妈说：“文庙广场是咱
们的‘老邻居’”。我说：“文庙广场是我的老朋友。”
小时候，我几乎每天都到广场报到。广场上绿树成荫，鸟语花香。我最喜欢广场上的大榕树了。夏天到了，大榕树是那么苍翠，就像撑起了一把巨伞。大人们在大榕树下乘凉，有的在跳舞，有的在吹、拉、弹、唱，有的在下棋，各得其乐。大榕树的气根最独特，垂直下来，就好像长了胡子似的。有一棵大榕树的身上盘了好多好多气根，如同贵妇人盘的头发超凡脱俗。
在我们小小的心里，文庙广场的一年四季都很美丽。春有烂漫的樱花；夏有 ；秋有穿黄衣的银杏树，十里飘香的桂花；冬有迷人郁金香。
文庙广场的美丽吸引了许多游客。当然，也给那些追求利益的商贩带来了机会。每到傍晚，好多的小商贩就在广场边缘聚合。有卖烧烤的、有拌凉面的、有卖天蚕土豆的……吆喝声此起彼伏。一阵阵呛人的油烟扑鼻而来，混搭着一股股怪味，真让人反胃。妈妈每次经过时，眉头都邹紧了。地上好多污垢、卫生纸、烧烤签、塑料袋到处乱扔，让广场美丽的服装变成了一件脏色的“艺术品”。
广场是我们大人和小朋友的乐园，请商贩们爱护“她”，就像爱自己家一样。请你们还给我一个干净、整洁、空气清新的广场。
我的自画像
德阳市一小 年级 班 黄柯源
指导教师：
不胖不瘦，中等个。一头乌黑光亮的头发，一对又大又圆的眼睛，一身轻便的运动装，构成了活泼机灵的我。
我今年九岁了，是个不折不扣的运动迷。爱好轮滑、踢足球。妈妈常常笑着说：“你尽喜欢些腿上功夫，难怪小腿这么结实。”记得有一次，我和小伙伴到体育场踢球，我们的对手是高年级的学生，但我们毫不退缩，积极迎战。正当我们踢得有劲时，天公不作美，忽然下起雨来。爸爸催促我们快回家，我哪里听得进去。大声回道：“继续踢，雨中踢球更爽！”爸爸也拿我没有办法。我们在操场上跑着、冲着，雨水打湿了脸也不豪不在乎。我负责进攻，我的队友防守，生怕“敌队”踢进了球。大伙争先恐后，踢得热火朝天。结果，我们打成了平手。那一刻，我兴奋得一蹦三尺高。
家人们说我是个“吃货”，这可一点不假。有一次，同学请我吃饭，我们点了牛肉、回锅肉、干锅等，这可全是我的最爱，我连上厕所都“百秒冲刺”，回来的时候，看到桌上鲜美的菜，我的口水都“飞流直下三千尺”，一屁股坐在板凳上，差点坐翻。我狼吞虎咽、前一口还没有吞下去，下一口又进嘴里。一口气吃了几大碗饭，吃完了，我打了个大大的饱嗝，大伙都笑了。可是，到了晚上，我可受苦了，我在床上翻来覆去，睡不着，都是因为吃得太多，肠道的食物消化不了，唉，真难受。
不过，你们别以为我只顾吃和玩。我也有不少积极的兴趣、爱好。比如：我坚持练钢琴已经有三年了，也取得了一些小小的成绩，平常我也喜欢读课外书、练字，假日里我还喜欢旅游
你喜欢这个阳光好动的我吗？我们交个朋友吧！
篇二:《南宋石刻公园》{德阳石刻公园作文}.
南宋石刻公园导游词{德阳石刻公园作文}.
各位游客朋友们:
大家好!
欢迎来到宁波市南宋石刻公园旅游。我是本次的导游，北有秦陵兵马俑，南有钱湖石刻群今天我要带领大家参观南宋石刻公园。——在我国石刻史上，南宋时期神道石刻资料较少，东钱湖南宋石刻群规模之大、数量之多、雕刻之精、分布之集中、保存之完美在中国尚属唯一。这里的石刻主要展示的是南宋时代的二位宰相史浩、史弥远的墓道石刻。一门三宰相，四世两封王”七十二进士”出自东钱湖下水村史氏家族，彰显史氏家族的显赫荣耀。填补了我国研究南宋时期美术史、文物考古史、雕刻艺术史的空白。
南宋石刻以造型准确，形体动作多样、表情生动而著称。园中的文臣、武将、蹲虎、立马、跪羊分别代表了“忠、勇、节、义、孝”，相当鲜明地再现了当时的历史人文景观。人物衣着的纹理大致可分为垂、拉、挤、飘四种，东钱湖南宋石刻的人物造形中，文臣的衣纹全部是垂挂纹，武将为扎挤纹，绝无飘动、抻拉的表现
文臣头戴的进贤冠、冠顶的梁数所表现的阶级官品，所着的右衽宽袖长袍，束带，袍下露裳（袍）蔽足，表现了文臣士大夫很高的内涵和修养。
武将的缨盔披甲、臂上的护袖、小腿上的护腿、以及由革带索定的胸前横贯的勒帛丝绳，和腰间所围的护腰，包括甲胄的皮编铁镶，均符合当时的格式。
东钱湖南宋石刻中的瑞兽，无一不给人以驯服温顺的感觉。虎不威、马不烈、羊不犟。这显然是一种时代性的象征
公园的“ 看点”可用一句话来概括，那就是：南宋石刻公园——五“独”
俱全。哪“五独”呢？一、独具规模的南宋石刻群。二、独具特点的风水宝地。
三、独具一格的南宋石刻艺术。四、独具格调的宋韵茶楼。五、独具匠心的吉祥文化展示形式。所以，简称五“独”俱全。
篇三:《德阳gre作文范文带翻译》
智课网GRE备考资料
德阳gre作文范文带翻译
想要提高新gre作文分数，我们就要深入地了解新gre写作要求，大家在备考新gre写作时要熟练掌握新GRE写作题库，懂得如何迎合评卷人的评卷思路，了解评分注重三方面，尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分，智课教育小编下面为大家详细介绍一下德阳gre作文范文带翻译。
GRE作文范文
"The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."
观点陈述型作文/[题目]{德阳石刻公园作文}.
"被置于媒体审视下的任何人，其名誉终将受毁损。"
Sample Essay{德阳石刻公园作文}.
The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a
subject has turned even minor media events into so-called "media frenzies". Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of
media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much
information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed.
范文正文
当今媒体报道的力度，由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类，从而被极大地增强。围绕着对最具暴露性的图片及对某一题材最新信息所展开的竞争，使哪怕是次要的媒体事件也转变为所谓的"媒体疯狂"。由于竞争的本质，记者们被迫就某一项报道作深度采访，以其窥探到一个任何其他人都无法揭示的视角。随着这类媒体报道的出现，任何被置于媒体报道之下的人，其名誉越来越有可能被玷污，因为"金无赤金，人无完人"。每个人都有可能犯错误。技术进步使大量的信息在第一瞬间便被轻易获取。技术也使媒体得以比以往任何时候更深入地去挖掘一个人的过去，从而更增加了当事人名誉受损的可能性。
The above statement is much too broad, however. "Anyone" covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that "anyone" subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone's reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown?
然则，上述陈述涵盖面过于宽泛。"任何人"涵盖了世界上所有的人。有些人的名誉反而会因为媒体的聚焦而陡然显赫起来。也有些人，其名声早就如此之糟糕，以致于媒体的聚焦再也无法让它受到更坏的毁损。笼统地陈述受媒体报道的"任何人"均会使其地位被玷污，这暗示着全球每个人的名声在任何种类的媒体聚焦下均易于遭诟病。那么，对于天真无辜的孩子们，尤其新生婴儿，情况会如何?对于那些其过去根本无人知晓的人来说，情况又会是什么样呢?
Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one's name in a newspaper
constitute media scrutiny? What about the coverage of a single event in someone's life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? Is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that person's reputation? It seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individual's reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.
对于这样一项笼统的陈述而言，它的另一个问题是没能明晰界定媒体聚焦的具体程度。媒体的报道毫无疑问存在程度上的差别。只在报纸上提及一个人的名字，是否算作媒体聚焦?对某人一生中单独一次事件(如婚礼或孩子出生)的报道这也算媒介聚焦吗?媒体对消防队员或警官因公而死的英雄壮举进行报道，难道也会毁损该人的名声吗?在这些实例中，其名声受损的事情极不可能发生。虽然这些人可能被置于媒体审视之下，但其名声却会完好无损，且潜在地可因这些披露而得以提高。
Without a doubt, there are many examples of individual's whose reputations have been diminished by media scrutiny. The media's uncovering of former U.S. President Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky will most likely overshadow the entire eight years of his administration. Basketball superstar Michael Jordan's sterling reputation has been
tarnished more than once by the media; first by media coverage of his gambling habits, then most recently (and in a much more harmful manner) by news reports of his marital infidelities and the divorce from his wife of thirteen years. Fame and fortune can turn an ordinary individual into a media target where reporters will stop at almost nothing to "dig up dirt" that will sell more newspapers or entice more viewers to watch a television program. It could even be
argued that media scrutiny killed Princess Diana as her car sped away from the privacy-invading cameras of reporters in Paris. There is no doubt that there are a large number of people who have been hurt in one way or another by particularly intense media scrutiny.
毫无疑问，也有许多例子能证明一个人的名声会被媒体审视所毁损。媒体对美国前总统Bill Clinton与Monica Lewinsky的风流韵事的揭露极有可能会将其八年的执政生涯置于阴影之中。超级篮球明星Michael Jordan一世英名也被媒体不止一次地玷污，首先是被有关其赌习的媒体报道，其次是最近–且以一种更具致命性伤害的方式–被有关他婚姻不忠以及与其结婚13年的妻子分道扬镳的报道。当媒体记者不择手段去挖掘某些可促使其报纸销量大增的"猛料"时，或去诱惑更多的观众观看某一电视节目时，名和利就会将一个普通人转变为媒体追踪的目标。我们甚至可以提出这样一种论点，即正是媒体的审视将Diana王妃置于死地，随着她的汽车去竭力逃脱巴黎街头的记者们那侵犯隐私的相机镜头。毫无疑问，肯定有许多人被极其强烈的媒体聚焦以一种方式或另一种方式所伤害。
In summary, it seems impossible that for every person that is subjected to media scrutiny, his or her reputation will eventually be diminished. Millions of people are mentioned in the media every day yet still manage to go about their lives unhurt by the media. Normal individuals that are subjected to media scrutiny can have their reputation either
enhanced or damaged depending on the circumstances surrounding the media coverage. The likelihood of a diminished reputation from the media rises proportionally with the level of notoriety that an individual possesses and the{德阳石刻公园作文}.
outrageousness of that person's behavior. The length of time in the spotlight can also be a determining factor, as the longer the person is examined in the media, the greater the possibility that damaging information will be discovered or that the individual will do something to disparage his or her reputation. But to broadly state that media scrutiny will diminish anyone's reputation is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given a long enough time and a certain level of intensity of coverage, the media may damage a person's reputation.
(766words)
归纳而言，对于每个被置于媒体审视的人来说，其名声将最终受到毁损似乎并不可能。每天，有数百万人被媒体提到，但他们仍设法我行我素，不为媒体所伤害。被置于媒体审视之下的普通人，其名声或可得到提高，或可蒙受毁损，取决于围绕着媒体报道的具体情况。一个人的名声受媒体毁损的可能性，与所其拥有的臭名昭著的程度，及其行为的令人厌恶程度成正比。受媒体关注的时间长短同样也是一个决定性因素，因为一个人被媒体审视的时间越长，于他名声不利的信息越有可能被抖落出来，或者该人越有可能去做出某些于其名声不利的事情。但只是笼统地陈述媒体的审视终将毁掉一个人的名声，即是过分夸大这样一种显著的可能性，即在足够长的时间和一度程度的报道力度这两个条件下，媒体是有可能毁掉一个人的名声的。
题目
GRE作文范文
Issue
"People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does."
Sample Essay
Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of "synergy", where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. But the idea that people work more productively in teams rather than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.
Regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. These people may evolve into the classic "Type A" personalities that work ferociously because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. Other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. For these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with other people limits their
effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. Whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.
Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. Obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. Organizational behavioral studies have shown that Asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with Western cultures. It could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.
Another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. Will the rewards be greater if the team
works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? To the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. Individual goals may interfere with the group performance. Synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole "sum" but rather towards an individual reward. Productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.
Finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend upon the type of team that is organized. Is the group composed of equally contributing individuals? Does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? From a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. Personality types that work well together can prove to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.
Fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on the individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. Whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with
others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks effectively and efficiently.
观点陈述型作文/[题目]
"当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效。团队的协同工作需要相互合作，它比个人竞争更能激励人们。"